Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 27.11.2017 11:38, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404631#c4 >> >> In this commit: >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nbdkit/c/f38f61c339f925928e8cd6e520581968105ada96 >> >> I accidentally disabled Python 3 support on Fedora. >> >> Is there a better way to write this? What I really need is a pair of >> macros "Python 2 is supported" & "Python 3 is supported" which I can >> use to conditionalize the spec file. Maybe checking if %{__python2} >> and %{__python3} are non-empty? > > In case you are still interested: > > %{__python3} is defined on Fedora, but not EPEL. However, python3 is > available in EPEL. If you only consider Fedora vs. RHEL (without EPEL), > than relying on %{__python3} would work. I don't think you can rely on __python3, that's not available to the default buildroot used to generate src.rpm's But, these are included in python-srpm-macros, which may be usable: # python3_pkgversion specifies the version of Python 3 in the distro. It can be # a specific version (e.g. 34 in Fedora EPEL7) %python3_pkgversion 3 # Set to /bin/true to avoid %ifdefs and %{? in specfiles %__python3_other /bin/true %py3_other_build /bin/true %py3_other_install /bin/true _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
