On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:24:56PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > I hope you are aware that user id 65534 is used by user namespacing > (i.e. CLONE_NEWUSER) too, and in that context is probably much more > prominently visible to users than in the NFS context. The fact that > the user/group is called "nfsnobody" is quite misleading if most users > see it only in the user namespacing context which has zero > relationship to NFS. Is there any security implication of re-using 65534 for user namespacing, since NFS was using it before? Why not assign a new uid for user namespacing? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
