> Chris Adams wrote: > > This is the very least that Fedora ought to do, and it has to be done > immediately! > > In addition, for future Fedora releases, the default browser ought to be > changed to one with a more trustworthy upstream, e.g.: > * QupZilla (soon to be Falkon) [https://www.qupzilla.com/], > * GNOME Web / Epiphany [https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web], > * Midori [http://midori-browser.org/] (the WebKit2 branch snapshots that are > already in Fedora). > > In the interest of desktop integration, I would actually suggest using a > different browser on different Spins, matching the shipped desktop > environment (QupZilla on KDE and LXQt, GNOME Web on GNOME/Workstation, > Midori on the others). > > That said, QupZilla, while being a Qt application, actually has better GNOME > integration than Firefox: It uses the system icon theme out of the box, it > has native look&feel and native file dialogs thanks to QGnomePlatform, and > there is even an optional plugin to make it use GNOME Keyring. > > In addition, using a browser adapted to the desktop would also provide a > much more integrated experience to our users: > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Mozilla_and... > https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-kde/msg13235.html > > Kevin Kofler IMO Going Back to SeaMonkey would be a Better Bet than any of the following Browsers you mentioned . _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
