On 2005-02-05 (Saturday) 13:00, Jamie Zawinski wrote:
> Iago Rubio wrote:
> >
> > Could be a problem to assume this, as self-signed certificates does not
> > require a CA - that'll pick some bucks from you to sign your
> > certificates - and it's sure self-signed certificates will be hanging
> > around for a while, because they're cheaper than CA signed ones.
>
> Absolutely -- I use pop3s (and a self-signed ssl cert) for my employees'
> email, and I'm sure not going to tithe anually to Verisign or whoever
> merely to avoid a one-time warning dialog for my dozen users. I'm sure
> lots of other small companies feel the same way.
I use self-signed CA. You can, as I do, install this CA's cert
in your user's PCs and get no warnings :) I see no reason buying
certificates unless you want to use them with a public service.
--
Regards,
Doncho N. Gunchev Registered Linux User #291323 at counter.li.org
GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/DA454F79 http://pgp.mit.edu
Key fingerprint = 684F 688B C508 C609 0371 5E0F A089 CB15 DA45 4F79
