Iago Rubio wrote: > > Could be a problem to assume this, as self-signed certificates does not > require a CA - that'll pick some bucks from you to sign your > certificates - and it's sure self-signed certificates will be hanging > around for a while, because they're cheaper than CA signed ones. Absolutely -- I use pop3s (and a self-signed ssl cert) for my employees' email, and I'm sure not going to tithe anually to Verisign or whoever merely to avoid a one-time warning dialog for my dozen users. I'm sure lots of other small companies feel the same way. -- Jamie Zawinski jwz@xxxxxxx http://www.jwz.org/ jwz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.dnalounge.com/ http://jwz.livejournal.com/
