Hey, On 12/07/2017 03:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 10:31 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> Where committed to the master branch and not to any other >> branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain >> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches. >> I have to make multiple commits to multiple branches >> which sucks... Something random people do not understand! > > You can bring branches back into line with merge commits. Can require a > bit of git juggling, but it's always doable in the end. > Fair enough... I understand git and how to bring things back into sync.. But the question is why does a maintainer have jump through these hoops for change they didn't make. All I'm trying to do is nip in the bud the notion that anybody can make any change they want to any package without going through the maintainer of that package. I don't know what any of the polices say but we can not let that happen if we hope to maintain stability. steved. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
