On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:52:46AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 09:29 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > * base100 > > > https://github.com/AdamNiederer/base100 > > > Encode things into Emoji. > > > > > > Base💯 can represent any byte with a unique emoji symbol, therefore it ca > > > n represent binary data with zero printable overhead (see caveats for more > > > info). > > > > Hmm, it seems that those package are not yet available. > > I see that rust-base100 was built in koji, but it's not available in repos. > > Same for fd-find and exa... Not sure what's going on here. > [root@e22df69ecc1c /]# dnf install base100 fd-find ripgrep tokei --assumeno > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:51 ago on Tue Nov 28 09:45:50 2017. > Dependencies resolved. > =============================================================================== > Package Arch Version Repository Size > =============================================================================== > Installing: > base100 x86_64 0.4.1-1.fc28 rawhide 347 k > fd-find x86_64 6.0.0-3.fc28 rawhide 679 k > ripgrep x86_64 0.7.1-5.fc28 rawhide 936 k > tokei x86_64 6.1.2-4.fc28 rawhide 555 k > > Transaction Summary > =============================================================================== > Install 4 Packages Indeed, I think I was confused by the binary rpm name being different then the srpm. It looks all good. Zbyszek > Total download size: 2.5 M > Installed size: 7.6 M > Operation aborted. > > exa is not yet available seems because still not in compose, but should be > there within few days (next compose). > > > On a related note: why is "exa" called "rust-exa"? The "rust-" prefix seems > > uncessary, for executables, since from the user's POV the implementation > > language is just an implementation detail. For libraries it'd be different. > > Same situation occurs with python programs, and the guidelines do _not_ > > prescribe python-dnf, but just dnf, etc. Is there any chance we could > > drop the "rust-" prefix from user programs? > > We have "rust-" prefix for all packages coming from crates.io because people > can easily turn their packages to contain library too which would be kinda > inconsistent without renaming whole package to contain prefix. > > But the good thing is that even sourcerpm is called `rust-exa`, binary rpm is > named `exa`, so users will always do `dnf install exa` and it will work for > them (and it will install `exa`, not `rust-exa` package). > > I hope this makes sense. If not, we would be happy to discuss it. Just open a > ticket: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/sig > > > Zbyszek > - -- > - -Igor Gnatenko > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlodMe4ACgkQaVcUvRu8 > X0yFPQ//VdttLEcxqt/+y2upGCEf2HDEvSvejwObOCJtBa3ZexXRWJKwfYVqGP0I > o3F+OwO/Es7EtNfkpzxfcHWf0LGhK1Hb51xoMn1Y1gXnQdVI9tZ4x5052V1e126/ > naPu9rfQ48dK+LKHXJbDQ6wTABQXsw5uF2mFCzvKs5ez5nQiKlRKUoB839MzfUBY > zICypU/03WKQGqQE4QseZCKaKgnZqDrvi5dhGN/f5jrJM6KvzBRhA/Kwhl/Gx/Q6 > 9fsXm1tlQZe3pkMhuESLXjI6ezjKC+yoYW4eYpazVZS91awiDDasuKf5AAn+k/Jl > vrphKcUg/8IZVMLW4cx1E/yv35+K0GQZ9k5135V8qtlAI0Wz1B9bGvkzB9zumXfi > QYHrYLsacliogfQaqeGwKfk+KDsHzfDT0Vr2QvuS2a0T/Gd7umHajNjfqgz8Bq2T > FhPpMMlLnBgafwXRGeFd1j1kWcmXgZwqFlLVcDNvPHmfhQILu5FpWDmJySEUwWkK > LFk63vSXiP0v5nq3OSsEcgsvyb36mhOSZBgvXe9cieBsSCtkkS+Fa03q+vWi1v+P > P3K/f7SQ7lWmsDUqrXzJnlNLhJYGR0T8mEGNB1l4OjNj7fIsu3m4ihaqC7wisn9H > +SftZtppF4HBni/8HO8bcH7SUyvEW8oSSY9/24Qn38LvURlezbo= > =OYzd > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
