On 11/23/2017 10:17 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Hello community,
We, as Red Hat SELinux team, apologise for recent delays with our answers to
your requests and questions related to SELinux. We have been quite busy last
couple of weeks so we decided to set a lower priority for Fedora work. We
already responded and resolved what was needed and we are ready to react
more flexibly in the future.
Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your
package, you can follow the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation on
wiki.
To update the tpm2-abrmd [0] package to the latest version, I need to
add a SELinux policy due recent upstream changes in the upstream
project. But after reading the documents referred in this thread, is
still not clear to me if the preferred method nowadays is to propose
adding the SELinux policy to the system wide selinux-policy package or
to ship a custom SELinux security module for the package.
Hi,
SELinux policy for this project is already existing? If not I can help
you with creating policy for this project. From SELinux team it's
prefered to add policy to your package. Guidelines how to do that is in
progress to be part of rpm packaging guidelines.
Lukas.
Regards,
Lukas
[0]: https://github.com/intel/tpm2-abrmd
Best regards,
Javier
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Lukas Vrabec
Software Engineer, Security Technologies
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
