Hello, On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > > Hello community, > We, as Red Hat SELinux team, apologise for recent delays with our answers to > your requests and questions related to SELinux. We have been quite busy last > couple of weeks so we decided to set a lower priority for Fedora work. We > already responded and resolved what was needed and we are ready to react > more flexibly in the future. > > Note: If you are interested in writing custom SELinux policy for your > package, you can follow the > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy documentation on > wiki. > To update the tpm2-abrmd [0] package to the latest version, I need to add a SELinux policy due recent upstream changes in the upstream project. But after reading the documents referred in this thread, is still not clear to me if the preferred method nowadays is to propose adding the SELinux policy to the system wide selinux-policy package or to ship a custom SELinux security module for the package. > Regards, > Lukas > [0]: https://github.com/intel/tpm2-abrmd Best regards, Javier _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
