On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:12:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora > >> > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for > >> > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month). > >> > >> Why not have a separate fedora-presets then? Just like fedora-repos was > >> split out from fedora-release several releases ago. > > > > Well, pfff, no particular reason, at least from my side. Just opening > > a new package and going through the (trivial) review, etc., is a bit > > of up-front effort, and then releasing updates for two packages is > > always a bit more effort then for one. So instead, I'd want a good reason > > to make another package and how that is going to solve something. So far I > > haven't seen anything except some hypothetical issues. > > This would allow us to deduplicate the presets shipped in > generic-release and fedora-release, wouldn't it? That is a very good point. It would probably make sense to do such deduplication. But I think it should be a separate step after fedora-release is reorganized. Doing everything at once is more likely to lead to a mess. But yeah, it's definitely something I'll want to do later on. Zbyszek > And as long has it has a "system-presets" Provides, downstream folks > can swap them easily enough. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
