Re: streamlining fedora-release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora
>> > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for
>> > systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month).
>>
>> Why not have a separate fedora-presets then? Just like fedora-repos was
>> split out from fedora-release several releases ago.
>
> Well, pfff, no particular reason, at least from my side. Just opening
> a new package and going through the (trivial) review, etc., is a bit
> of up-front effort, and then releasing updates for two packages is
> always a bit more effort then for one. So instead, I'd want a good reason
> to make another package and how that is going to solve something. So far I
> haven't seen anything except some hypothetical issues.

This would allow us to deduplicate the presets shipped in
generic-release and fedora-release, wouldn't it?

And as long has it has a "system-presets" Provides, downstream folks
can swap them easily enough.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux