Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-10-27)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * #1785 Mesa/Nouveau maintainer(s) should be required to ship the
>   (sgallagh, 16:51:30)
>   * AGREED: FESCo understands that this is a serious issue, but doesn't
>     feel that it should override the decision of the subject matter
>     experts (+6, 0, -0)  (sgallagh, 16:54:22)

So users will keep having to enable a Copr to get a working driver. (The one 
Fedora ships is totally unusable.) <SARCASM>Way to go!</SARCASM>

        Kevin Kofler
        (who is getting really pissed off at FESCo decisions lately!)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux