Re: Packaging Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello all,

Again thanks for the help!!! 

On 10/26/2017 09:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> William Moreno wrote:
>> Provides: libnfsidmap-devel%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>>
>> Move this line under
>>
>> %package -n libnfsidmap-devel
>>
>> And you should get a clean update path
> 
> As Hedayat Vatankhah pointed out, if the package is called libnfsidmap-
> devel, it does not actually need to Provide itself. So the 
> Obsoletes/Provides should go away entirely.
> 
> Obsoletes/Provides are needed if the BINARY package name changes. E.g., if 
> we had:
> %package libnfsidmap-devel
> (without the -n), generating a nfs-utils-libnfsidmap-devel subpackage, THEN 
> it would make sense to Obsolete and Provide libnfsidmap-devel in that 
> subpackage (NOT in the main package). But since %package -n is used to 
> recreate the same old package name, there is nothing to Obsolete and Provide 
> to begin with.
I follow what you are saying but... when I remove both the Obsolete and Provide
for libnfsidmap-devel (only Provides: libnfsidmap is set in the nfs-utils section)
the upgrade still wants to remove libnfsidmap-devel package instead of upgrading it.

# dnf --best --allowerasing update /tmp/*rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:35:42 ago on Fri 27 Oct 2017 10:04:58 AM EDT.
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
 Package                 Arch       Version              Repository        Size
================================================================================
Upgrading:
 libnfsidmap             x86_64     1:2.2.1-0.fc28       @commandline     102 k
 nfs-utils               x86_64     1:2.2.1-0.fc28       @commandline     413 k
 nfs-utils-debuginfo     x86_64     1:2.2.1-0.fc28       @commandline     986 k
Removing:
 libnfsidmap-devel       x86_64     0.27-1.fc26          @fedora          3.3 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Upgrade  3 Packages
Remove   1 Package

Total size: 1.5 M
Is this ok [y/N]: 

Which is confusing... 

Note the '--best --allowerasing' is needed for the libnfsidmap to be upgraded
(which I don't think is a big deal)

tia,

steved.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux