Re: Packaging Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/26/2017 09:40 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:12 PM Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     William Moreno wrote:
>     > Provides: libnfsidmap-devel%{_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
>     >
>     > Move this line under
>     >
>     > %package -n libnfsidmap-devel
>     >
>     > And you should get a clean update path
> 
>     As Hedayat Vatankhah pointed out, if the package is called libnfsidmap-
>     devel, it does not actually need to Provide itself. So the
>     Obsoletes/Provides should go away entirely.
> 
>     Obsoletes/Provides are needed if the BINARY package name changes. E.g., if
>     we had:
>     %package libnfsidmap-devel
>     (without the -n), generating a nfs-utils-libnfsidmap-devel subpackage, THEN
>     it would make sense to Obsolete and Provide libnfsidmap-devel in that
>     subpackage (NOT in the main package). But since %package -n is used to
>     recreate the same old package name, there is nothing to Obsolete and Provide
>     to begin with.
> 
> 
> 
> One more caveat: make sure that the ENVR (epoch, name, version and release) of the new libnfsidmap package sorts higher than that of the former standalone package, or else it won't act as a replacement.
It will be... significantly.... Thanks!

steved.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux