Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:04:58PM -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> >>But that's not the end of the fun.  GCL failed the mass rebuild this
> >>summer.  It built successfully on every architecture but s390x.  On
> >>s390x, the build failed due to a failed call to mprotect(), almost
> >>certainly a sign that SELinux was in enforcing mode on the builder.
> >>Was that a known issue with s390x builders?  And, if so, has it been
> >>rectified since?  If so, I'll try building again.
> >AIUI the builders run with SELinux disabled.  Has this changed?
> >
> >Rich.
> >
> Is there a particular reason for this? I'd think Permissive would be
> a better option, so that any issues can be noted and (potentially)
> resolved down the line.

Sorry, I meant Permissive (but not Enforcing).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux