Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:12 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the
> update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch?
> 
> background:
> I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the
> new library is a major rewrite that does not support older camera
> models. After consulting with upstream, I came to the conclusion that we
> should stay with version 1 for the librealsense package and submit
> librealsense2 as a separate package. I think Debian is planning to do
> the same thing. Therefore, I need to downgrade librealsense in rawhide
> to version 1.

No other distribution package uses this library yet.

# dnf repoquery --whatrequires librealsense --alldeps
librealsense-devel-0:1.12.1-10.fc27.i686
librealsense-devel-0:1.12.1-10.fc27.x86_64
# dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'librealsense2.so.2()(64bit)'
#

Also, the SONAME is 'librealsense2.so.2' already, so the current naming of
the package isn't ideal anyway. Without any idea about who may be using
this package already for private development, I would not worry much
about the minor complications caused by an upgrade in Rawhide.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux