On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you're getting a bit needlessly confrontational at this point.On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 17:13 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I'm surprised that people use updates-testing for stable/production
> > machines, have problem with handling the update and act like newbies. If
> > you can't handle that, don't use that. Fedora is really a bleeding edge so
> > don't complain you get new software with new features - even as testing
> > only :)
> >
> > Where is Matthew Miller when you need him? No one said anything about
>
> using updates-testing for stable/productioin machines. And the fact that
> you're implying that Fedora itself is bleeding edge and not really suited
> for production raises a huge red flag.
>
> i have no doubt when this whole situation is reviewed logical minds will
> prevail, but in the meantime you've taken advantage of a loophole.
> Congratulations.
The issue's been sufficiently well raised now. Let's try to move
forward productively from here...
Exactly what is confrontational? I quoted his statement. Yes, the issue has been raised.
Martin is apparently going to keep it in updates-testing because that's what he wants to do.
It may or may not be reviewed - and he took advantage of a loophole. Since when is in confrontational to summarize
facts?
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
