Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:05 PM Heiko Adams <ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.10.2017, 07:53 -0700 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
By definition BETA software is never intended to be pushed to stable.  Fx 57 is BETA.  When the STABLE version is released, then it can go into updates-testing.  Not before.  Again, that is the purpose of RAWHIDE.
Does this mean it's also not allowed to push packaged git-snapshots of a software to updates-testing because they are unreleased and potentially unstable?

I think Gerald's position is overstating it. Upstream's definition of what is "beta" or "stable" is informative but not definitive.

However, in this particular case, the maintainer has stated that this version of the package is *not* intended to actually go to the stable Fedora repository, which says to me that it should not be in the updates-testing stream at all. The point of u-t is to be a last-chance check on the quality before it goes out to all users. It's not intended to be a prototyping location; that's one of COPR's jobs.


You need to read my entire statement in context.  That is not what I meant.  As I replied to Heiko: 

"My opinion however is common sense dictates that you don't put anything in updates-testing unless you intend to push that software to stable.  If you want people to test out experimental software, put it in RAWHIDE.  If it's a git-snapshot and your INTENT is to push it to stable (for example, you're fixing a bug) then that is OK for updates-testing.

In this instance, there is no intent to push Fx 57 BETA to stable.  That's why it does't belong in update-testing."

In this instance, I believe that RAWHIDE would be appropriate - since it not so much a prototype as a BETA release of a single package which is being released within a month.  Something like a test release of KDE/GNOME which is comprised of multiple packages would be ideal for COPR - but a Fx BETA COPR would be an excellent idea also.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux