On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 22:24:01 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro > > > > <mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:mike.catanzaro@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth > > > > <james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged > > breaking changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the > > most recent 1.x in F27 and below at this time. > > > > The latest version should be a self contained change in F28. > > > > I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is > > that if it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27, > > since one of the current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4) > > is gone. So the update should go into F27 as well (which has not > > even reached beta yet, despite the freeze). The updates policy is > > very important, but it doesn't trump common sense. :) > > > > The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue > > and keeping it in Fedora. > > > > Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with > > our policies I'd suggest. > > I attempt to build Sparkleshare 1.5 on master but the main issue is the > webkitgitk dependency. Suggestion welcome to fix that: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/luya/rpms/sparkleshare/blob/master/f/spar > kleshare.spec Hello Luya, I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/ The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0 compatibility. It builds in Mock and Koji but I haven't attempted to run the program itself. Best regards, Robert-André _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
