man, 31.01.2005 kl. 21.42 skrev Rodd Clarkson: > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 19:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > > > > Yes. But it isn't mandatory. They are broken, but they only look broken in > > > firefox@fc3 - so people believe that firefox is broken. > > > > it isnt mandatory. it is just a good design issue. firefox doesnt > > emulate IE quirks perfectly either. people believe firefox is broken > > on those IE specific websites too. thats a user education problem. > > > > > And yes, i do also remember that Mosaic had a gray background. 10 years ago. > > > > > > So, please, please set the *default* settings so that most pages doesn't > > > look broken. > > > if this is going to be done, change the gnome system colors on the > > whole to reflect this inorder to be consistent > > Actually, a web browser is a little like getting a ream of paper. While > you can get paper in a range of colors, when you ask your mate to grab a > ream of paper when he's at the office supplies, you expect him to come > back with a ream of 'white' paper, and almost all your documents are set > up for white paper unless you particularly wanted a different color. > > The same thing should happen with web-browsers. User's expect a white > background. Hell, a lot of bad web designers expect a white background. > > It might be worth asking the mozilla guys why the default background > color changed from grey to white. I suspect that it had something to do > with the fact that most users just went and changed the color to white > because the grey was annoying (they expected white). > > My point exactly. Now, can we fix this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=146907
