On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 15:00 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 09/01/2017 02:21 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > This is true and we have plans to implement this, but problem is > > that > > we don't know how to represent data. When it is about installing > > some > > packages -- it's more or less easy to show, but when upgrades / > > downgrades are involved it becomes way more complicated. > > > > If you have some actual suggestions -- feel free to contact me off > > list > > or post them here. ☺ > > I won't claim to be a huge fan of the way that yum insisted on > spewing detailed dependency information, but it did provide the > information require to answer those "Why does Inkscape require > mdadm?" type questions. The old repoquery had a --tree-requires option which was really great for this. (along with a few other --tree-* options) -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
