On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 09:25:22PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > So the request is for there to be a way to indicate that a stream is > available for explicit dependencies, but *shouldn't* be taken into > account for implicit stream expansion yet. Then, once the low level > stream is stable, *then* its maintainers can flick the switch to say > "OK, this looks healthy, start building new variants of all the > modules that depend on this one". Okay, I get it now. :) I still think the Service Level field would be useful here; maybe by policy dependent modules wouldn't be auto-expanded against streams tagged as "alpha". -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
