On Thursday, August 31, 2017 11:43:08 AM CEST Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm curious why you insist on 'make srpm'; that sounds like you try to push
> > the copr users somewhere, to "standardize something".
>
> It's easier on implementation. That's the main reason. I generally believe
> that what's easier on implementation is better.
This is not first time we talk about this...
(a) can you elaborate what's "easier" to implement on the 'make srpm' way?
(b) shouldn't you make a life easier to your users? Even when I really like
make, what's easier on "enforcing" Makefile existence to be able to
enable CI in copr?
(c) Wrong general belief, please, forget about that. Doing it wrong (== an
"easier" way) in the beginning is much more expensive in the end (try to
grep for "refactor" word...). The proposal is to have "one method"
which suits everybody; and never touch it again. But yeah, no-thanks for
not listening. Again.
Pavel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
