Re: Mysterious build, perhaps tagged to wrong release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sandro Mani wrote:
> Right, I suppose given the smallish audience affected by this, it's
> better to violate the update guidelines once than introducing a
> permanent epoch bump.

FYI, there are still ongoing plans to upgrade the native qt5-qtbase in F26 
to 5.9.1, you may want to follow suit with mingw-qt5-qtbase when that 
happens. I would also stick to 5.8.0 for now.

I just hope rel-eng did not screw up more packages that way.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux