On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:50 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:28:45 +0000 (GMT), Mark J Cox <mjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What would be incredibly useful is to move (to being a Provides) the CVE > > names for issues that we're including a backported fix for. Where we've > > moved to an upstream version that contains fixes those CVE names are less > > important as they can be deduced by a simple NV check. > > I look forward to building pathological packages that have a requires > on a CVE name provides. fedora-secure-system could require all the CVE's that are ciritical to be fixed yum update fedora-secure-system would then only pull security updates down....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
