On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: >> >Yeah, that would get crazy fast. The 6 month granularity proposal >> >should help*some*, and we should probably go into this carefully. >> >> Technically, the SL for the module could have the narrow meaning >> referring to the module only, and the tools could follow the chain >> of dependencies and display it as: >> >> Service Level: 6 months (effective SL: 3 months/EOL: 2017-11-08 due >> to dependency on openSSL) > > Ouch. Yes, but I think that that should be a warning sent to the module > maintainers (and collectively to devel list) rather than show to end > users. > I think this data needs to be displayed to users. As a sysadmin, I would absolutely want that information available to me similar to how I am able to check/view security update information with 'dnf updateinfo'. -AdamM > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
