Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >Yeah, that would get crazy fast. The 6 month granularity proposal
> >should help*some*, and we should probably go into this carefully.
> 
> Technically, the SL for the module could have the narrow meaning
> referring to the module only, and the tools could follow the chain
> of dependencies and display it as:
> 
> Service Level: 6 months (effective SL: 3 months/EOL: 2017-11-08 due
> to dependency on openSSL)

Ouch. Yes, but I think that that should be a warning sent to the module
maintainers (and collectively to devel list) rather than show to end
users.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux