On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 16:15 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > > > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > > > > > boomaga > > > calligra > > > cups-filters > > > evas-generic-loaders > > > gambas3 > > > gdal > > > gdcm > > > inkscape > > > kf5-kfilemetadata > > > libreoffice > > > okular > > > pdf2djvu > > > poppler-sharp > > > texlive > > > texworks > > > > Welp, the rebuild of texlive failed, which means gdal can't be built, > > and I can't build openqa. And none of this seems to have been touched > > since yesterday, > > Umm? Did you really check? > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-completion_time&userID=803 By 'this' I meant 'poppler and texlive' - I didn't check any others. > > Perhaps next time, you could test rebuilds of at least major things > > like texlive against the new poppler *before* you land the new poppler > > into rawhide? Thanks. > > And then, if test rebuild of such a big package like texlive against > new poppler fails, poppler maintainer has to wait until texlive is > to be ported into new poppler? Yes. Yes, exactly that. We're building a distribution, we're not running a Who Can Get A New Release Into The Repos The Fastest contest. If something as important as texlive (which half the world depends on) doesn't build against a new version of something, we don't want the new version in our distribution yet. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
