Re: 'No More Alphas': wiki revision drafts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:16:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> quite meet what we aspire to. I do *NOT* propose to have any kind of
> blocker tracking bug for the Basic release criteria; it doesn't seem to
> fit in the process, there is no Alpha release to block, and we can't
> realistically block nightly composes on manual test results. So a
> tracker bug wouldn't really have any reason to exist. In the case where
> a violation of the Basic criteria makes it into composes despite the
> automated testing, it should be marked as a Beta blocker.

Will the blockerbugs app start showing F28 blockers at the F27 branch
point? Or sometime later? From my point of view, the sooner the better.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux