Re: Build failures on alternative ("secondary") arches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 14:37:47 +0100
Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 03/08/17 14:34, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 
> > I've got two nasty packages. One fails to pass the tests on
> > BigEndian arches (s390x, ppc64), another one fails to pass the
> > tests on POWER (ppc64 and ppc64le).
> > 
> > So I have several questions.
> > 
> > * Can I have a shell access to the ppc64 machine (which covers both
> > cases) where I can install packages and can run gdb / git / gcc?
> 
> There are ppc64 and ppc64le machines - see here:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> 
> No s390x but a failure common to all big endians can likely be
> debugged on ppc64.

right, using ppc64 is the preferred (and easier) way, but we can provide
access to s390x guest as well if needed


		Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux