Re: [modularity] First round of Boltron feedback published

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> The thing that jumps out immediately is that respondents _really_
>> prefer the "dnf module install httpd" syntax — 73% love or like that,
>> while 7% dislike or hate it. 21% love or like "dnf install httpd" for installing
>> modules, while 46% dislike or hate it. And a full half of that dislike
>> is hate, or in other words more people completely hate it than like or
>> love it _combined_. The "dnf install @httpd" syntax gets just a little
>> bit less hate, but also less love.
>
> I talked to Langdon, who is a strong advocate of the "bare" `dnf
> install httpd` syntax.
>
> His argument is that modules should be seen as if they are
> metapackages¹, and that it would be an odd extra step to have to
> effectively first enable the ability to install packages and _then_
> install them. I'll let Langdon make his own argument, but basically
> akin to shipping Fedora split in different repos, some of them
> disabled. That's because with the other options, if you install Modular
> Fedora and don't have an enabled module containing the package you ask
> for, you get "that doesn't exist".²
>
> This did not convince me, exactly — but it did sway me in favor of the
> `dnf install @httpd` syntax. That's because I think these are really
> more like Super Comps Groups (with more and better metadata and
> multi-stream powers!) than they are like virtual packages, and I still
> think the bare syntax is confusing because behavior will be different
> based on something you might not know before you run the command. And
> we already _have_ the @whatever syntax for comps groups.

How does it distinguish between comps groups and modules, how does it
resolve conflcits between the two? I think a designator makes sense
but I don't think that should be @

Peter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux