Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 00:02 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > So that's effectively a hard design constraint for me: folks > > targeting EL6 and EL7 *are* going to have to use "/usr/bin/python" in > > their shebang lines (since they can't even assume "/usr/bin/python2" > > will be present, > > Wait, what? > > I see /usr/bin/python2 in the EL7 spec file: > > https://git.centos.org/blob/rpms!python.git/c7/SPECS!python.spec#L2041 > > I'm pretty sure I had /usr/bin/python2 back in the days when I was > using EL6. (but I have no way to check that now) I just checked: $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.9 (Final) $ ll /usr/bin/python* -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4864 18 aug 2016 /usr/bin/python lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 25 aug 2016 /usr/bin/python2 -> python -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4864 18 aug 2016 /usr/bin/python2.6 $ rpm -q --file /usr/bin/python* python-2.6.6-66.el6_8.x86_64 python-2.6.6-66.el6_8.x86_64 python-2.6.6-66.el6_8.x86_64 Unless this is different in RHEL than in CentOS I don't see how /usr/bin/python2 could be missing if /usr/bin/python is present. Björn Persson
Attachment:
pgp98x0GhUuai.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
