Le lundi 31 janvier 2005 Ã 14:25 -0500, Jeff Spaleta a Ãcrit : > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:57:07 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot > <Nicolas.Mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >(this is by no means a demand, just my own POW - if Raw Hide can't > > be used before test releases it's little use for everyone, Red Hat > > included) > Instead making rather unrealistic demands that packages in rawhide > build flawlessly on the first attempt... Like I said, this is any sort of demand. Please do not put words that I explicitly refused to use in my mouth. I was answering the assertion that " You can't expect real stability until the few weeks prior to release when everything freezes and the various glitches are worked out. If there was any mandate to keep Rawhide stable at all times, it would be the equivalent of production and they would have to put out Beta/RC releases for Rawhide! " A "few weeks prior to release" is way too late to start worrying about stabilising Raw Hide. You know it and I know it. Therefore the first poster was perfectly right to expect the stabilisation to be under way by now (and to fill a bug). Presenting Raw Hide to be so dangerous you can not beta-test it is as counter-productive as expecting it to be perfect. It's more raw than FC, but with a little care it won't eat your brainz either (to quote a famous post on this list). Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
