On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:58:52AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Yeah, that last point is the real difficult issue, it forces you to keep > > the RPM in parallel with the flatpak, unless we were to either change > > RPM (yuk), or find a way to auto-generate a RPM wrapper around the flatpak > > to pull in it contents. > > You need to keep the RPM anyway because there are users out there (e.g., me) > who are NOT going to install a Flatpak, but demand native packages. Kevin, *please*, *please* tone down the negativity. You can "demand", but the project is not bound by demands. You have to *convince* people. There are good arguments to keep RPMs around, at least for the foreseeable future, so don't burn them by non-technical posts. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
