Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 10:40 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 07:47:58AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > To give an example outside of the kernel, the installer 'Reclaim Space'
> > > > function has been broken on i686 for about 10 months, and no-one seems
> > > > to be lining up to fix that one either:
> > > 
> > > To be fair, no-one seems to be lining up to fix anaconda bugs in general...
> > 
> > I don't think that's fair at all. There is a whole anaconda team that
> 
> Case in point. The anaconda team fixes bugs in anaconda. There are few (no?)
> outside contributors.

https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commits?author=AdamWill
https://github.com/storaged-project/blivet/commits?author=AdamWill

I've never had any trouble contributing to it. You can submit PRs to
github.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux