On 07/12/2017 05:44 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
"developers not having to learn GPG to sign their *Flatpak* releases" I really don't understand how you misinterpreted that sentence so badly, individual Fedora developers never had to GPG sign their Fedora packages...
That "*Flatpak*" was not in the original sentence and it really confused me too. I was pretty sure individual maintainers didn't sign the RPMs, so I wondered why that was a benefit of flatpaks. So now I understand that the point is that Fedora signs the flatpaks instead of the developers of the applications.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
