Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 13:30, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 12:16 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> 
> > I still have my N270 netbook, but I guess even more people still have
> > Z6xx-based devices. Still, they're over 7 years old at this point.
> 
> The N270s are still supported by Windows 10.
> 
> Furthermore: Linux (thus Fedora) has always one of the last resorts for
> people wanting to escape Windows' and their violent HW obsolesence on older
> HW.
> 
> Do you want Fedora to join this choir? I don't.

Me neither. However, I don't have the time to spare on working on i686
bugs. I will probably submit bug reports if something is broken, but
won't have time to fix them myself.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux