Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 12:04, Christian Dersch wrote:
> On 07/12/2017 02:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >> Considering that SSE2 was introduced by Intel in 2001 and AMD caught up
> >> with it in 2003, I'd be +1 (with my FESCo hat on) to requiring SSE2,
> >> regardless of whether the above change is accepted.
> > If you require SSE2, you limit the usefulness of the i686 kernel to 
> > basically just a single generation of CPUs, the next generation introduced 
> > x86_64.
> >
> Well, there is one very important CPU family which came some years
> later: Intel Atom. There are still many netbooks out there and the first
> Atom generations are 32 bit only afaik.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Atom

The 32 bit-only ones are:
Z5xx (April 2008)
Z6xx (May 2010)
N2xx (June 2008)

I still have my N270 netbook, but I guess even more people still have
Z6xx-based devices. Still, they're over 7 years old at this point.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux