Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:57 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 02:06, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Considering that SSE2 was introduced by Intel in 2001 and AMD
> > > caught up
> > > with it in 2003, I'd be +1 (with my FESCo hat on) to requiring
> > > SSE2,
> > > regardless of whether the above change is accepted.
> > 
> > If you require SSE2, you limit the usefulness of the i686 kernel
> > to 
> > basically just a single generation of CPUs, the next generation
> > introduced 
> > x86_64.
> 
> Right. It probably makes sense to abandon i686 kernels altogether,
> then.

IIRC my first x86_64 was from 2006 [1], which means all hardware before
that will not run Fedora . Thinking that we are discussing if we still
should support floppy disks ... 
Sometimes I think we should have more balance, please consider also el6
 which have EOL in November 30, 2020 

[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_Dual-Core
[2]
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

Cheers,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux