Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dne 11.7.2017 v 23:17 Solomon Peachy napsal(a):
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:55:25PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
>>>
>>> He won't install it on his home desktop PC or work laptop. He rather find
>>> an old dusty laptop from 2005 in his shed and starts to learn there.
>>
>>
>> If we're being honest, a typical 2005-era laptop is going to yield a
>> rather lousy experience with any modern Linux Desktop.  (And an even
>> lousier experience with modern Windows!)
>>
>>
>
>
> The question is - why - certainly not  because CPU got less powerfull that
> it's been 10-12 years back -  but  when   gnome clock  needs  30MB,
> and rendering of html pages  often takes over 100MB - and nobody cares about
> any performance regression since  new shiny i7 is so fast to 'mask' all
> programmers faults and 32GB or RAM also needs some usage....

A consequence of Moore's law, and deflationary pressure on computer
technology. As that's changing, there's increasing pressure on code
optimization to get performance advances.

-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux