On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:02:25PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:49:32PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 8.7.2017 v 20:43 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > > Nah, most likely stg.fp.o is just some rpi on somebody's desk or a vm > > > stuck in the corner of the infrastructure. I don't think you can make > > > any conjectures about performance or reliability based on the staging > > > instance. > > > > Nope. AFAIK Stg machines are real machines in proper infrastructure. They may be slow by few percent, but moving to prod > > will not make it much faster. So if anything is slow in STG then it is valid issue. > > They are real machines but may have less memory or cpus than prod ones. So it is > at this stage a little hard to figure how better or worse it will be in prod. Although also fair to point out there've been numerous performance improvements thus far, and no reason to think there won't be more. Pagure is eminently hackable so we are still encouraging contribution upstream (of which there has been a lot already). -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
