Hello all, In today's FESCo meeting we discussed the fact that there are many RPMs currently in Fedora (a reported 244 in Rawhide currently) that are defining a `Provides: bundled(<lib>) = <version>` but excluding the version completely[0][1]. This removes that ability to properly perform source code auditing and security vulnerability tracking. My question to the Fedora Contributor Community is, how should we handle this? Is this something that should just simply be fixed by the packages currently violating the Guidelines, should the Guidelines be altered in a way that makes this easier to deal with for Packagers but also provides what is needed for auditing and vulnerability tracking, or is there simply clarification needed by what is required in the <version> field? I look forward to the discussion. Thank you, -AdamM [0] - https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1734 [1] - https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/696 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx