Re: Proposed Mass Bug Filing: Renaming "python-" binary packages to "python2-"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29 June 2017 at 10:44, Iryna Shcherbina <ishcherb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>

>
> Why would it stop building?
> By explicitly defining the dependency to be py2 one in your Python 2
> package, you will just make sure it will not start pulling Python 3
> dependencies in a few years when the switch happens.
>
>

Personally I think that going with py3  -> py at any time is going to
be a problem. Will there never be a python4 or python5? Will we just
leave that problem to repeat itself in 2028? when we have to do
another complete rename because python3 is EOL?

[I am also of the opinion that the history of computer language
changes has proven that even after a language is EOL it is still used
in too large of a base for many many many years after people say it
should be gone. I am expecting that no matter how much we want py3->py
we will find in 2028 that some major bleeding edge user still relies
on python2. ]

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux