Re: Rawhide: where for art thou? (why no rawhide composes recently)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13 June 2017 at 17:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 08:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> Some folks may have noticed that there have been no completed rawhide
>>> composes in a while (13 days as of today).
>>>
>>> This has been due to a variety of bugs and issues, along with pungi now
>>> failing composes that don't have all required release blocking items.
>>
>> Is there a way we can loosen that up for rawhide and have it tightened
>> down for branched. I think it's worth while to have at least a flow of
>> the everything repository out on a regular basis like the old pre
>> pungi-4 use to do.
>
> Possibly yes. But I think the idea was to do it for rawhide as well and
> thus always be at least "Alpha" quality so we could not do alpha anymore.

That was my take on the "no more alphas". If we can't do this then we
are going to have to look at doing an alpha in the schedule because it
is clear we aren't able to stabilize enough for that promise to exist.

> kevin
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux