El lun, 05-06-2017 a las 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa escribió: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a > > whole. > > > > Not always. Most of the time, they are, yes. But if someone chose a > Free Software license other than that or if the spec file was from > the > upstream project, it's usually under different terms. > > FPCA guarantees that it'll be MIT if not specified without requiring > a > SUSE-style license header at the top of each spec file. > yes if a user chooses to license it under another license they are free to do so. Not sure I have ever seen that in practice, however given there is over 18,000 source packages I have not read every spec file. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
