Re: The future of the packager group for dist-git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Spec files are licensed under mit license the same as fedora as a whole.

Dennis

On 2 June 2017 3:07:15 pm GMT-05:00, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 09:42:48PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
(Note: pagure can and will enforce the FPCA for dist-git)

I know Richard Fontana has expressed some interest in reducing the need
for FPCA. Maybe this is an opportunity to move in that direction? I
know Spot has said that "License In = License Out" is adequate for
projects on Github; I think Spot's concern with spec files is that we
don't give them an explicit license (right)?

As we're moving things, can we do something in Pagure to cover this, so
the FPCA isn't needed here?


--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux