On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build > infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block > any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release. I think ultimately we need a way to get these out of lockstep with the main release. We should be able to build and publish Spins/Labs on their own cycles (ideally without human intervention required from rel-eng). How much use do you see of the Astronomy Spin as bootable media or its own install? For some, this really makes sense (the desktops, the security lab) but it seems like maybe Astronomy might be better as a curated software set in GNOME Software? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
