Re: License field in spec file, spdx compliance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The most recent discussion about this topic was here:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/IF3ZSIUBFXN24XOJTL7CLQVB66ATRTYY/


Vít


Dne 21.5.2017 v 22:10 Sandro Bonazzola napsal(a):
> Hi,
> I was trying today to prepare a single spec file for both Fedora and OpenSuse and hit a small issue on the License field.
> Fedora requires license to be shortened as listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
> While OpenSuse requires license to be shortened as listed in https://spdx.org/licenses/
>
> Being spdx a collaborative project within Linux foundation, I think there may be value in aligning fedora licensing short names with spdx list.
> I was going to open bugzilla to track it, then decided to open the discussion here first.
> Any thought?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux