On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:05 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > has any consideration been give to the size increase required by the > change from libidn (678k) to libidn2 + libunistring (228k + 1246k)? > That's not *too* bad, since currently none of the things which depend > on idn end up in the initramfs, but still, it's noticeable. Note also that these packages will increase in size as unicode standard evolves. libidn due to IDNA2003 was tied to a specific old standard while libunistring gets updated to the latest one thus includes much more data than the previous ones. I do not know whether the glibc switch from libidn to libidn2 would provide some benefit in that aspect. regards, Nikos _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
