Hello all, I agree with Rafal. I think that in the case of small or medium packages this would be counterproductive. Kind regards, Silvia On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 01:16 +0200, Rafal Luzynski wrote: 24.04.2017 12:47 Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:[...] I know I can do this for packages I maintain, but I though it would make sense to think of it globally. Maybe? Bye, MilanIf I may drop my 2¢… this sounds good to me for large packages, for example LibreOffice, glibc and KDE which do it already and Evolution as a good candidate to implement this change. But for small packages which have not so many translatable messages producing dozens of small RPMs ~1 kilobyte each or even less would doesn't sound like a good solution. So I suggest to introduce this feature but not globally and obligatorily for all packages. Additionally, I think that for some purposes installing all languages for some specific applications would be useful so I also suggest providing something like glibc-all-langpacks. Regards, Rafal _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
